Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
1.2 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
1.2 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
1.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
0.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
0.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 5.1 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
I would not recommend submitting articles to this journal. They only had one reviewer who missed the point of the whole paper. It was also obvious he/she did not bother reviewing the whole article and knew nothing about the topic. The editor's handing of the manuscript was also very poor as only 1 review was obtained and decision was based on that one poor review with limited feedback. However, In all fairness a neurology journal is not a place to submit pain/headache articles.
0.0
Very bad process
1 review
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines

Clinical neuroscience

Related journals

Lancet Neurology Neurology Molecular Neurobiology