Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
3.1 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
5.2 months
Decision time immediate rejection
9 days
Average number of review rounds
1.7 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
2.0 / 5.0 (easy)
Average number of review reports
1.7 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
2.7 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
2.3 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 6.1 weeks. Overall rating: 2 (moderate). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The reviewers identified so-called weaknesses that were not weaknesses at all. They were easily refutable. However, the editor did not give us the chance to revise the manuscript, arguing that the weaknesses were difficult to address. It is a pity that we were not able to defend our work. I appreciate the editor for sending out the manuscript to reviewers, but I give a low score for judgment of the revisions required. The main argument against our manuscript was flawed and could be easily refuted.