Review this journal

Food Policy

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 5 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 4.0 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 6.1 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 11 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 1.5 compare →
Average number of review rounds 2.0 compare →
Quality of review reports 3.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 2.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 28.2 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Rejected.

It took this journal 11 months and two rounds of review to reach the conclusion that my article should be rejected. In the first round the managing editor conducted the review and suggested revisions. I painstakingly addressed her reviews which were decent. In the second round the editor found a new reviewer and their review was really terrible. It was very lazy and not did not seems fair at all - it made sweeping comments with no justification. It also attacked the research design which is something fundamental that obviously remained unchanged. The editor should never have sent the paper out for review and made us go through 11 months if there was a design flaw. This is my second terrible experience with this journal and I will definitely never submit there and will actively discourage any of my students and colleagues from submitting there.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Food Policy has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.