Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
2.5 months
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
2.5 months
Decision time immediate rejection
n/a
Average number of review rounds
1.0 rounds
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
3.0 reports

Characteristics of peer review process

Quality of review reports
3.0 / 5.0
Overall rating manuscript handling
5.0 / 5.0

Latest review

First review round: 11.0 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
Article rejected, but based on three review reports that were received very rapidly. Not the outcome desired, but happy to receive it rapidly. The reviewers seemed rather knowledgeable on the topic, although one reviewer recommended rejection based on an aspect of the article that they admitted was not their expertise. That was disappointing, but the overall decision was based on comments of all three reviewers.