SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 31 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 1.3 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 2.1 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 9 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.4 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.8 compare →
Quality of review reports 4.1 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.6 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 4.4 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

Motivation:
Despite having a total of 7 figures and 8 supplementary figures, it was unclear for the editors what added value the paper had for the scientific knowledge. Moreover , single cell RNAseq was considered to be a standard technique in the field and was lacking in our manuscript. Most of the comments were rebuttable, however the Editor felt that pushing the paper to external review would only make us lose time as we would probably receive another rejection.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Elife has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.