Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Duration of manuscript handling phases

Duration first review round
n/a
Tot. handling time acc. manuscripts
n/a
Decision time immediate rejection
1 days
Overall rating manuscript handling
n/a

Characteristics of peer review process

Average number of review rounds
n/a
Difficulty of reviewer comments
n/a
Average number of review reports
n/a
Quality of review reports
n/a

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

Motivation:
The editor immediately rejected the manuscript arguing it was a poor fit. Given the fast decision, I highly doubt whether sufficient efforts were invested in checking out the rich content of the manuscript, and I suspect the decision to be based on the title and abstract only. No arguments were provided as to why the manuscript was a poor fit. I found this very disappointing.