Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
The editor immediately rejected the manuscript arguing it was a poor fit. Given the fast decision, I highly doubt whether sufficient efforts were invested in checking out the rich content of the manuscript, and I suspect the decision to be based on the title and abstract only. No arguments were provided as to why the manuscript was a poor fit. I found this very disappointing.