Latest review
First review round: 17.4 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad).
Outcome: Drawn back.
Motivation:
After nearly 4 months of waiting for peer review, Reviewer 1’s comments focused mainly on formatting and minor language issues, without raising any significant concerns about the research quality. Reviewer 2 was even more supportive, suggesting only minor revisions. However, the editor still rejected the paper. Save your time and money—don't select this journal.
I saw similar comments on SCIREV, and I never thought I’d be treated the same way.