Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 17.4 weeks. Overall rating: 0 (very bad). Outcome: Drawn back.

Motivation:
After nearly 4 months of waiting for peer review, Reviewer 1’s comments focused mainly on formatting and minor language issues, without raising any significant concerns about the research quality. Reviewer 2 was even more supportive, suggesting only minor revisions. However, the editor still rejected the paper. Save your time and money—don't select this journal. I saw similar comments on SCIREV, and I never thought I’d be treated the same way.