Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
18.4 weeks
18.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
1
Rejected
2022
Motivation: The waiting time for the reviews was relatively long (4 months). While we received helpful feedback from the reviewers and most of their comments were addressable, the editor decided to reject our ms. The main justification for this decision was too high N of submissions per year (over 600) to this journal.

In this spirit, to help the editor to limit the N of submissions, my suggestion would be to consider another journal for your ms. Another reason for NOT submitting to the CBSN is a submission fee of $50! A quick calculation: 600 x $50 = $30k annual income for the journal based on such submission fee (sic!)
16.3 weeks
19.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2020
Motivation: The reviewer's comment improved the quality of the paper. The Editor played a very solid role in speeding up the review process.
9.3 weeks
14.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2016
11.0 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
2
Rejected
2015
Motivation: While it seems the reviewers pointed out legitimate and correctable concerns (most of them would even considered as minor), the decision was to reject. While it is the absolute prerogative of the editor to reject, it seems pity that the process of rejection took almost 3 month, despite favorable reviews,
6.9 weeks
25.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
1
Rejected
2012