Journal info (provided by editor)

Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
Immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 11.9 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The only criticism I have is the very long time spent in review for a very short and simple technical note. It spent almost 12 weeks in review and received only very minor comments from 2 reviewers (e.g. that it would be helpful to clarify a word used or to add a further column to a table). Thus we were able to address the comments easily within 3 days. The decision to accept came one month after we resubmitted. It is very hard to understand how it could take that long.
3.0
Good process
Space for journal cover image

Disciplines