Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 11.9 weeks. Overall rating: 3 (good). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The only criticism I have is the very long time spent in review for a very short and simple technical note. It spent almost 12 weeks in review and received only very minor comments from 2 reviewers (e.g. that it would be helpful to clarify a word used or to add a further column to a table). Thus we were able to address the comments easily within 3 days. The decision to accept came one month after we resubmitted. It is very hard to understand how it could take that long.
3.0
Good process
Space for journal cover image