Conservation Biology

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Conservation Biology has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases
Duration first review round n/a compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts n/a compare →
Decision time immediate rejection 15 days compare →
Characteristics of peer review process
Average number of review reports n/a compare →
Average number of review rounds n/a compare →
Quality of review reports n/a compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments n/a compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling n/a compare →

Latest review

Outcome: Rejected (im.).

The editor consulted another editor and they both decided that the scope was too narrow for this journal. Our study included multiple countries, and trophic interactions across multiple plant and animal species in agricultural systems so we were a bit surprised by the result. Apparently you need to study a single mammal species in one system for it to be broad enough in scope. My impression is that the journal prioirtizes novelty and charismatic taxa even though it isn't explicitly stated. They offered to transfer the paper to their new 'pay to play' open access journal "Conservation Science and Practice". We couldn't afford the publication fee so we weren't able to publish with them. The response we got was positive though and overall an ok experience. I wish it hadn't have taken almost 3 weeks to get desk rejected though.