Reviews for "Computers and Electronics in Agriculture"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 21.7
weeks
21.7
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The reviews I received were poorly written. One of the reviews only consisted of two meaningless sentences just saying that the proposed approach may not work in real world conditions without any further comments. However, I discussed extensively in the paper that this is a first case study to check the general feasibilty.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 3.7
weeks
3.7
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Reviewers had generic criticism about the fact that other authors (they name them, but they do not point to specific papers) already addressed the same problem. Not pointing out any specific paper is very annoying because of course authors are convinced that there are differences w.r.t. literature work. Just saying that other authors worked in the same area or the same problem without the possibility to verify it is not enough. Other criticism was ok in the sense that they required further experiments and practical validation. However, saying that what is proposed cannot be implemented in practice in a straightforward way is again generic without pointing out any specific concern about the transferrability of the result in the real world.
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture n/a n/a 3.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 18.0
weeks
28.1
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted