Review this journal

Combustion and Flame

SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 0.3 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 1.3 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.5 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.5 compare →
Quality of review reports 2.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 3.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 2.5 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 2.7 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

Motivation:
The reviewers were not familiar with my field of research and did not understand the implications of the results. They seemed only to be interested in their own types of investigation in the field of combustion. One of them made rather condescending comments. The other was partially positive. It might have been possible to submit a revision, but the attitudes of reviewers and editor dissuaded me, and I published a revised paper in another, better journal, with which I am very happy.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Combustion and Flame has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee?
n/a
Kind of complaint procedure
n/a
Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.