Reviews for "Combustion and Flame"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Combustion and Flame 2.7
weeks
2.7
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The reviewers were not familiar with my field of research and did not understand the implications of the results. They seemed only to be interested in their own types of investigation in the field of combustion. One of them made rather condescending comments. The other was partially positive. It might have been possible to submit a revision, but the attitudes of reviewers and editor dissuaded me, and I published a revised paper in another, better journal, with which I am very happy.
Combustion and Flame 0.3
weeks
4.3
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Very agile review process. Reviewer's comments were irregular, some of them were very useful and insightful, others were trivial.