SciRev ratings (provided by authors) (based on 2 reviews)

Duration of manuscript handling phases Click to compare
Duration first review round 1.3 mnths compare →
Total handling time accepted manuscripts 4.8 mnths compare →
Decision time immediate rejection n/a compare →
Characteristics of peer review process Click to compare
Average number of review reports 2.0 compare →
Average number of review rounds 1.5 compare →
Quality of review reports 2.0 compare →
Difficulty of reviewer comments 5.0 compare →
Overall rating manuscript handling 3.0 (range 0-5) compare →

Latest review Show all reviews

First review round: 4.0 weeks. Overall rating: 1 (bad). Outcome: Rejected.

The editor agreed "with both reviewers that [what we pointed out] only hold for this paper but for many more" but stated that "It seems unfair to specifically target this issue for this paper". When we proposed to write a more general letter to the Editor addressing this common error, the Editor dismissed it as falling "beyond the scope of Appetite". I believe this shows lack of interest for the integrity of the Scientific Method.

Show all »

Journal info (provided by editor)

The editor of Appetite has not yet provided information for this page.

Space for journal cover image
Issues per year
Articles published last year
Manuscripts received last year
% accepted last year
% immediately rejected last year
Open access status
Manuscript handling fee?
Kind of complaint procedure
Two-year impact factor
Five-year impact factor
Disciplines: Nursing, Psychology

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.