Reviews for "Appetite"

Review this journal Show journal page
Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a n/a 0.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2018
4.0
weeks		 4.0
weeks		 n/a 2 0
(very bad)		 1
(bad)		 Rejected 2016
Motivation: The editor agreed "with both reviewers that [what we pointed out] only hold for this paper but for many more" but stated that "It seems unfair to specifically target this issue for this paper". When we proposed to write a more general letter to the Editor addressing this common error, the Editor dismissed it as falling "beyond the scope of Appetite". I believe this shows lack of interest for the integrity of the Scientific Method.
7.6
weeks		 22.7
weeks		 n/a 2 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted 2017