Reviews for "Appetite"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Appetite | n/a | n/a | 0.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Appetite | 4.0 weeks |
4.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 0 (very bad) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The editor agreed "with both reviewers that [what we pointed out] only hold for this paper but for many more" but stated that "It seems unfair to specifically target this issue for this paper". When we proposed to write a more general letter to the Editor addressing this common error, the Editor dismissed it as falling "beyond the scope of Appetite". I believe this shows lack of interest for the integrity of the Scientific Method. | |||||||
Appetite | 7.6 weeks |
22.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |