Reviews for "Antioxidants and Redox Signaling"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 4.6
weeks
11.4
weeks
n/a 5 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: Roughly 50% of the initial reviewer's comments were data we had on hand but were hoping to publish as a follow-up article as the model system was slightly different and the overall message could have been spun to incorporate a much broader audience; however, in the end the addition of this data made for a more complete story and probably a higher appeal for the smaller, target audience of the journal. Another 20% required the generation of completely new data sets which took quite some time and in only cases do I feel added to the completeness of the story. The final 30% were minor editorial changes that mirrored the preferences of the reviewers.
Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 2.0
weeks
2.0
weeks
n/a 5 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected