Journal info (provided by editor)

% accepted last year
n/a
% immediately rejected last year
n/a
Articles published last year
n/a
Manuscripts received last year
n/a
Open access status
n/a
Manuscript handling fee
n/a

Impact factors (provided by editor)

Two-year impact factor
n/a
Five-year impact factor
n/a

Aims and scope

The editor has not yet provided this information.

Latest review

First review round: 10.1 weeks. Overall rating: 5 (excellent). Outcome: Accepted.

Motivation:
The review process was very good, even though the first editorial decision took quite a long time (more than 10 days I think). After that, the editor was able to secure two editors in a short amount of time, and the reviews were returned in a few weeks. The reviews were of good quality by researchers working in similar topics. It was accepted with minor revisions. The revised version was accepted after a few days, suggesting it was not sent for review again. Overall, the experience was very good, would be even better if the time to the first editorial decision is shorter.
3.1
Good process

Disciplines