Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
17.6 weeks
25.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
3
Rejected
2018
n/a
n/a
106 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
Motivation: The article was not a good fit for the journal, which is perfectly acceptable and was decided shortly upon submission. However, I received the results four months after submission, with a note from the editor saying, " Please accept my apologies for the delay in getting this letter to you. I had written it some months ago and neglected to click on "send."
n/a
n/a
273 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2011
Motivation: This was a very long review, unconventional as it seemed the paper was reviewed by one reviewer only (a member of the editorial board I assume), and the feedback given by the editor was extremely short, unhelpful, and worryingly off topic. I will not submit a paper there again.