Reviews for "Work, Employment and Society"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome	Year
Work, Employment and Society	12.1 weeks	12.1 weeks	n/a	3	2 (moderate)	3 (good)	Rejected	2019
Work, Employment and Society	Motivation: We fruitlessly waited about 4 weeks between time referees concluded their reports and the editor Final decision. However, the Editor simply reported reviewers' reports without any personal evaluation of the paper. Reviewers' reports were quite short (one made by few lines)
Work, Employment and Society	n/a	n/a	61.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)	2017
Work, Employment and Society	Motivation: I have submitted an article for a special issue. After almost two months, I have received desk rejection without any comments apart from a note that they were overwhelmed with the number of submissions.
Work, Employment and Society	n/a	n/a	11.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)	2017
Work, Employment and Society	Motivation: The decision to reject the manuscript related largely to the rather under-developed theoretical contribution within the field of the assessed content. The editor considered the empirical material as strong and to be commended. As there was little extension and development of existing sociological theories and concepts which is what would be needed to progress further through the WES review process, the editor recommended to submit the paper to a different journal.
Work, Employment and Society	20.0 weeks	20.0 weeks	n/a	3	2 (moderate)	2 (moderate)	Rejected	2015
Work, Employment and Society	Motivation: Received three half-page reviews which made clear that the reviewers did not like the manuscript, but were not particularly engaged or constructive.
Work, Employment and Society	14.1 weeks	37.3 weeks	n/a	3	5 (excellent)	5 (excellent)	Accepted	2014
Work, Employment and Society	Motivation: The second round took a bit too long
Work, Employment and Society	14.1 weeks	36.3 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	5 (excellent)	Accepted	2014
Work, Employment and Society	n/a	n/a	25.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)	2015
Work, Employment and Society	8.7 weeks	8.7 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Rejected	2014
Work, Employment and Society	22.0 weeks	46.7 weeks	n/a	3	5 (excellent)	4 (very good)	Accepted	2013
Work, Employment and Society	4.3 weeks	9.0 weeks	n/a	3	5 (excellent)	5 (excellent)	Accepted	2013
Work, Employment and Society	Motivation: The review process was thorough and critical but constructive. It very much helped us to improve the manuscript. The handling editor was very clear about how to make the manuscript suitable for publication in the journal and fast in making decisions. Overall, a very positive experience.
Work, Employment and Society	13.0 weeks	28.2 weeks	n/a	3	3 (good)	3 (good)	Accepted	2011