|Journal title||Average duration||Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
|(click to go to journal page)||1st rev. rnd||Tot. handling||Im. rejection||Number||Quality||Overall rating||Outcome|
|Wood Science and Technology||8.9
|Motivation: reviewers had very few comments.
A very positive point is that after internal acceptation, someone read carefully the article to check english and misprint. It improves the overall manuscript.