Reviews for "Weed Research"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Weed Research 22.9
weeks
53.9
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted
Motivation: This manuscript took a long time to get accepted. It was basically put on hold due to one reviewer keeping on questioning some aspects of the paper due to lack of understanding. The editor-in-chief finally took over and suggested us to make some last changes before accepting the article. I appreciated the attitude of the editor-in-chief in not blindly relying on one negative reviewer. He went through the manuscript himself and took a decision. Although I am very satisfied with the editor-in-chief, the whole process turned out to be way too lenghty.
Weed Research 10.3
weeks
10.3
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Most of the comments of the reviewers were solid and useful. It took two weeks before the subject editor made a decision based on the reviewer comments. However, an aditional review report was added by the subject editor.