Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
0.1 weeks
15.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
2
Accepted
2022
Motivation: The considerations made by the reviewers were partly wrong. After the first round of reviews (with three resubmissions), one reviewer decided that the work did not present scientific innovations and, therefore, should be rejected. After that, the article was sent to two more reviewers, who, after another round, accepted the work.
3.0 weeks
3.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
3
Accepted
2020
Motivation: Fast, but 2 out of 3 Reviewers might be out of the field
1.6 weeks
1.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2020
5.1 weeks
7.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
5
Accepted
2020
5.0 weeks
5.7 weeks
n/a
4 reports
3
2
Rejected
2017
Motivation: This journal processes the manuscripts quite fast but the quality of the review might not be high.