Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.1 weeks
9.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
Review process a bit slow - this was a review article and since the review phase took so long we had to update the review with the new papers that had come out since then (quite a lot actually). Besides one of the reviewers was overzealous, picking on things that made no sense. The other two were quite fine. The editor is charming. Once the revised version was submitted the decision happened fat. Overall a nice experience.
12.7 weeks
12.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
Very constructive reviews and a fast decision after submitting the revised manuscript.
8.0 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
Review process was fast, and the comments from reviewers were reasonable.
13.0 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2014
13.0 weeks
13.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2014
15.2 weeks
17.2 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
Review process generally ok, no specific comments