Reviews for "Water Research"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
8.1
weeks
9.6
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: Review process a bit slow - this was a review article and since the review phase took so long we had to update the review with the new papers that had come out since then (quite a lot actually). Besides one of the reviewers was overzealous, picking on things that made no sense. The other two were quite fine. The editor is charming. Once the revised version was submitted the decision happened fat. Overall a nice experience.
12.7
weeks
12.9
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: Very constructive reviews and a fast decision after submitting the revised manuscript.
8.0
weeks
8.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Rejected 2016
Motivation: Review process was fast, and the comments from reviewers were reasonable.
13.0
weeks
14.0
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2014
13.0
weeks
13.6
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2014
15.2
weeks
17.2
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted 2013
Motivation: Review process generally ok, no specific comments