Reviews for "Waste Management"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Waste Management | 9.6 weeks |
11.3 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Waste Management | 7.1 weeks |
14.3 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: There were four reviewers for the 1st round of revision, and then one reviewer for the second round. The journal handled the review process effectively. | |||||||
Waste Management | 21.0 weeks |
27.1 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
Waste Management | n/a | n/a | 50.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: Submission was rejected because it was considered out of the journal scope. It took 7 weeks for this decision. | |||||||
Waste Management | 10.1 weeks |
10.1 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: Editor final comment about rejection is not consistent with reviewers' comments and suggestions. So, it was not clear why the paper was not accepted. | |||||||
Waste Management | 13.0 weeks |
22.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Reasonable speed for answer, good quality reviews that added value to the paper. | |||||||
Waste Management | 13.0 weeks |
17.4 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |