Reviews for "Waste Management"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Waste Management 8.7
weeks		 10.7
weeks		 n/a 4 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: The journal maintained reasonable time for handling the paper. The reviews were professional and constructive. The editor suggested some corrections to improve the quality of the paper.
Waste Management 9.6
weeks		 11.3
weeks		 n/a 3 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Waste Management 7.1
weeks		 14.3
weeks		 n/a 4 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: There were four reviewers for the 1st round of revision, and then one reviewer for the second round. The journal handled the review process effectively.
Waste Management 21.0
weeks		 27.1
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 2
(moderate)		 Accepted
Waste Management n/a n/a 50.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Submission was rejected because it was considered out of the journal scope. It took 7 weeks for this decision.
Waste Management 10.1
weeks		 10.1
weeks		 n/a 3 3
(good)		 3
(good)		 Rejected
Motivation: Editor final comment about rejection is not consistent with reviewers' comments and suggestions. So, it was not clear why the paper was not accepted.
Waste Management 13.0
weeks		 22.7
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted
Motivation: Reasonable speed for answer, good quality reviews that added value to the paper.
Waste Management 13.0
weeks		 17.4
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted