Reviews for "Waste Management"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
8.7
weeks
10.7
weeks
n/a 4 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2021
Motivation: The journal maintained reasonable time for handling the paper. The reviews were professional and constructive. The editor suggested some corrections to improve the quality of the paper.
9.6
weeks
11.3
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2020
7.1
weeks
14.3
weeks
n/a 4 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2015
Motivation: There were four reviewers for the 1st round of revision, and then one reviewer for the second round. The journal handled the review process effectively.
21.0
weeks
27.1
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
2
(moderate)
Accepted 2017
n/a n/a 50.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Motivation: Submission was rejected because it was considered out of the journal scope. It took 7 weeks for this decision.
10.1
weeks
10.1
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Rejected 2015
Motivation: Editor final comment about rejection is not consistent with reviewers' comments and suggestions. So, it was not clear why the paper was not accepted.
13.0
weeks
22.7
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2011
Motivation: Reasonable speed for answer, good quality reviews that added value to the paper.
13.0
weeks
17.4
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2011