Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.7 weeks
10.7 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2021
Motivation:
The journal maintained reasonable time for handling the paper. The reviews were professional and constructive. The editor suggested some corrections to improve the quality of the paper.
9.6 weeks
11.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2020
7.1 weeks
14.3 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
There were four reviewers for the 1st round of revision, and then one reviewer for the second round. The journal handled the review process effectively.
21.0 weeks
27.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
n/a
n/a
50 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation:
Submission was rejected because it was considered out of the journal scope. It took 7 weeks for this decision.
10.1 weeks
10.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2015
Motivation:
Editor final comment about rejection is not consistent with reviewers' comments and suggestions. So, it was not clear why the paper was not accepted.
13.0 weeks
22.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2011
Motivation:
Reasonable speed for answer, good quality reviews that added value to the paper.
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2011