Reviews for "Waste Management"

Review this journal Show journal page
Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
8.7
weeks		 10.7
weeks		 n/a 4 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted 2021
Motivation: The journal maintained reasonable time for handling the paper. The reviews were professional and constructive. The editor suggested some corrections to improve the quality of the paper.
9.6
weeks		 11.3
weeks		 n/a 3 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted 2020
7.1
weeks		 14.3
weeks		 n/a 4 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted 2015
Motivation: There were four reviewers for the 1st round of revision, and then one reviewer for the second round. The journal handled the review process effectively.
21.0
weeks		 27.1
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 2
(moderate)		 Accepted 2017
n/a n/a 50.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Motivation: Submission was rejected because it was considered out of the journal scope. It took 7 weeks for this decision.
10.1
weeks		 10.1
weeks		 n/a 3 3
(good)		 3
(good)		 Rejected 2015
Motivation: Editor final comment about rejection is not consistent with reviewers' comments and suggestions. So, it was not clear why the paper was not accepted.
13.0
weeks		 22.7
weeks		 n/a 2 5
(excellent)		 4
(very good)		 Accepted 2011
Motivation: Reasonable speed for answer, good quality reviews that added value to the paper.
13.0
weeks		 17.4
weeks		 n/a 3 4
(very good)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted 2011