Reviews for "Waste and Biomass Valorization"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Waste and Biomass Valorization | 13.0 weeks |
19.5 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
Motivation: out of the 3 reviewers, 2 did not send new reports indicating that the manuscript was ok for publication. However, 1 reviewer believed that the changes were not satisfactory, however, most of his comments were about details in the methods. I felt that it took too long for the manuscript to be rejected based on the opinion of only 1 reviewer, I also believe that it could have been sent again to revision. | |||||||
Waste and Biomass Valorization | 14.3 weeks |
14.9 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Waste and Biomass Valorization | 8.7 weeks |
8.7 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |