Reviews for "Voluntas"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Voluntas 13.0
weeks
21.7
weeks
n/a 3 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Voluntas 22.1
weeks
31.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The entire review process went pretty fast. The reviewer comments were quite positive, and it was not too difficult to revise and resubmit the manuscript.
Voluntas 13.0
weeks
13.0
weeks
n/a 1 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The single reviewer who advised rejection wrote about the "interesting" aspects of our ms, but then offered three minor objections (one of which was that a table was oddly placed!). The concerns could have been addressed in a revision so I did not feel the objections warranted rejection. I think we deserved a chance to respond to the reviewer's suggestions. When I asked the Editor for additional feedback I received no reply. Rejecting a ms on the basis of one poor quality referee report is unprofessional.