Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
20.6 weeks
20.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2023
Motivation:
I have published over a dozen peer-reviewed papers in top journals from several disciplines, and I have never encountered such a disorganized review process. The main culprit is the Editor, who let our paper sit without reviewers for four months despite my reminders. In the end, he did invite reviewers, but only one reviewer accepted the invitation to review. Then, I sent him a list of ten suggested reviewers. Instead of inviting them, the Editor just rejected the manuscript on the sole basis of one, largely incompetent review.
What a mess, and a huge waste of time. I suggest staying far away from this journal as long as the current editorial team stays in place.
What a mess, and a huge waste of time. I suggest staying far away from this journal as long as the current editorial team stays in place.
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
It was a bit long have the criticisms of the reviewers