Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
15.1 weeks
21.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2017
Motivation: Excellent work by the editor who helped us navigate one difficult reviewer.
18.1 weeks
42.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
1
Rejected
2016
Motivation: My article was rejected after two review rounds. However, I already convinced two of my three reviewers after the first round. In addition, it is my believe that the editor could have known before sending my paper back to the last reviewer that my changes would not satisfy this reviewer and he should have decided to either accept or reject my paper immediately after I resubmitted the second time. Lastly, the quality of some of the arguments of that final revision was very low.