Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.0 weeks
6.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
In my opinion, the quality of the review process is dictated by the availability of the editors for communication. In this regard, Trends in Genetics was great. I was kept informed of the process of the manuscript as it went through the process. I had one clarifying question about a comment from a reviewer that was handled quickly. Great process