Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Motivation: Excellent experience. Demanding but knowledgeable, reasonable, and prompt reviews that have improved the paper. The editor was quite prompt. The only issue is that the paper took too long to appear online after being accepted, but that's the issue of the publisher (Elsevier) rather than the journal team.
Motivation: The editor explained that there was not enough theoretical development.