Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.3 weeks
14.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
2017
Motivation: Another good experience with this journal. The reviewers were constructive and provided important remarks that improved the manuscript. The whole process is well and fast handled by the editor.
12.4 weeks
17.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2017
Motivation: I think it has a good editorial board. Because they have carefully reviewed the reviewers' comments and have seen the potential of my manuscript after the first decision. So they gave me another change by requesting a major revision. In addition, this journal accepts Latex format as the recommended one which is a good point since Latex compilers are Open Source and free to be used by everyone.
75.1 weeks
75.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
2012