Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
2.0 weeks
2.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Rejected
2016
12.3 weeks
55.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
4
Accepted
2015
Motivation: The review process is delayed significantly due to one reviewer who did not revise the paper on time. Also the associate editor did not asses the reviewers results for a long time.