Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2024
Motivation:
Desk rejection with generic feedback provided and lis of comments that would usually apply to desk-rejected papers. Absence of speciific or constructive feedback
Authors are reminded, as part of the feedback on the manuscript I presume, that "Tourism Review is one of the leading tourism journals"
Authors are reminded, as part of the feedback on the manuscript I presume, that "Tourism Review is one of the leading tourism journals"
4.7 weeks
4.7 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2023
Motivation:
In terms of time, Tourism Review and the Editor conduct reviews in a timely manner. However, the quality of the reviews were not good, suggesting a lack of knowledge in the topic.