Reviews for "The EMBO Journal"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
The EMBO Journal	n/a	n/a	5.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
The EMBO Journal	Motivation: Fast process, and reasons for rejection were explained. It was evident that the editor had read the paper.
The EMBO Journal	n/a	n/a	4.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
The EMBO Journal	Motivation: Poor initial assessment. The argumentation for rejection was scientifically incorrect (claiming that the structures we report are known, which is not true).
The EMBO Journal	n/a	n/a	5.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
The EMBO Journal	Motivation: Fast and efficient process. A few lines from the Editor showing that the paper was at least quickly read.
The EMBO Journal	n/a	n/a	3.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
The EMBO Journal	Motivation: Very fast process. The justification that no new molecular process was identified, seems acceptable, for publication in this journal.
The EMBO Journal	n/a	n/a	4.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
The EMBO Journal	n/a	n/a	4.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
The EMBO Journal	n/a	n/a	5.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)