Reviews for "The EMBO Journal"

Review this journal Show journal page
Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
The EMBO Journal 5.7
weeks		 9.6
weeks		 n/a 3 5
(excellent)		 5
(excellent)		 Accepted
Motivation: The editor was quick to judge, read and evaluate the content, and the paper was made better by the referee and editor's suggestions.
The EMBO Journal n/a n/a 1.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The ms was immediately rejected however I was really impressed that it took the editors only one day and the reasons for rejection were explained. Definitely, the editor had read the paper.
The EMBO Journal n/a n/a 5.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Fast process, and reasons for rejection were explained. It was evident that the editor had read the paper.
The EMBO Journal n/a n/a 4.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Poor initial assessment. The argumentation for rejection was scientifically incorrect (claiming that the structures we report are known, which is not true).
The EMBO Journal n/a n/a 5.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Fast and efficient process. A few lines from the Editor showing that the paper was at least quickly read.
The EMBO Journal n/a n/a 3.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Very fast process. The justification that no new molecular process was identified, seems acceptable, for publication in this journal.
The EMBO Journal n/a n/a 4.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
The EMBO Journal n/a n/a 4.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
The EMBO Journal n/a n/a 5.0
days		 n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)