Reviews for "The BMJ"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
The BMJ n/a n/a 4.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Submitting to the BMJ requires somewhat more effort than elsewhere. E.g. if you provide forest plots you also have to send the data etc. Rejection rate is 94%.
The BMJ 8.6
weeks
8.6
weeks
n/a 4 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Motivation: Very quick turn around time and high-quality reviewer reports. Ultimately the paper was rejected but peer review helped us improve our work.