Reviews for "Text and Talk"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Text and Talk | 72.9 weeks |
91.3 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The initial review procedure took more than a year and the evaluation of our resubmission also took fairly long, taking into account that the paper was not sent back to the evaluators. The evaluations as such were interesting, though the fact that the paper we submitted was not about English did seem to bring about some issues for one of the reviewers. After the final acceptance, the paper was quickly available online. | |||||||
Text and Talk | 64.9 weeks |
65.9 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
2 (moderate) |
Accepted |
Motivation: While the reviews were detailed and helpful, the process took way too long, and the lack of progress wasn't communicated. The typesetting done by the publisher was terrible, introducing a range of errors after the proof stage. |