Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
72.9 weeks
91.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
The initial review procedure took more than a year and the evaluation of our resubmission also took fairly long, taking into account that the paper was not sent back to the evaluators. The evaluations as such were interesting, though the fact that the paper we submitted was not about English did seem to bring about some issues for one of the reviewers. After the final acceptance, the paper was quickly available online.
64.9 weeks
65.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
While the reviews were detailed and helpful, the process took way too long, and the lack of progress wasn't communicated. The typesetting done by the publisher was terrible, introducing a range of errors after the proof stage.