Reviews for "Text and Talk"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Text and Talk	72.9 weeks	91.3 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	2 (moderate)	Accepted
Text and Talk	Motivation: The initial review procedure took more than a year and the evaluation of our resubmission also took fairly long, taking into account that the paper was not sent back to the evaluators. The evaluations as such were interesting, though the fact that the paper we submitted was not about English did seem to bring about some issues for one of the reviewers. After the final acceptance, the paper was quickly available online.
Text and Talk	64.9 weeks	65.9 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	2 (moderate)	Accepted
Text and Talk	Motivation: While the reviews were detailed and helpful, the process took way too long, and the lack of progress wasn't communicated. The typesetting done by the publisher was terrible, introducing a range of errors after the proof stage.