Reviews for "Technovation"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Technovation | 26.0 weeks |
69.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 1 (bad) |
1 (bad) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Very low quality of reviews. Reviewers changed multiple times during the process. No clarification of reviews by editor. Communication took long and it was difficult to get any replies. | |||||||
Technovation | n/a | n/a | 4.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Technovation | 8.7 weeks |
8.8 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Technovation | 34.7 weeks |
69.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
1 (bad) |
Accepted |
Motivation: It took forever. | |||||||
Technovation | 26.0 weeks |
26.0 weeks |
n/a | 1 | 0 (very bad) |
0 (very bad) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The referee did not read the paper but he/she rejected the paper with una sentence without motivation. |