Reviews for "Technovation"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Technovation 26.0
weeks
69.4
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Accepted
Motivation: Very low quality of reviews. Reviewers changed multiple times during the process. No clarification of reviews by editor. Communication took long and it was difficult to get any replies.
Technovation n/a n/a 4.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Technovation 8.7
weeks
8.8
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Technovation 34.7
weeks
69.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
1
(bad)
Accepted
Motivation: It took forever.
Technovation 26.0
weeks
26.0
weeks
n/a 1 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The referee did not read the paper but he/she rejected the paper with una sentence without motivation.