Reviews for "Technovation"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
26.0
weeks
69.4
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: Very low quality of reviews. Reviewers changed multiple times during the process. No clarification of reviews by editor. Communication took long and it was difficult to get any replies.
n/a n/a 4.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2016
8.7
weeks
8.8
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2013
34.7
weeks
69.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
1
(bad)
Accepted 2012
Motivation: It took forever.
26.0
weeks
26.0
weeks
n/a 1 0
(very bad)
0
(very bad)
Rejected 2013
Motivation: The referee did not read the paper but he/she rejected the paper with una sentence without motivation.