Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
26.0 weeks
69.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
1
Accepted
2016
Motivation: Very low quality of reviews. Reviewers changed multiple times during the process. No clarification of reviews by editor. Communication took long and it was difficult to get any replies.
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
8.7 weeks
8.8 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2013
34.7 weeks
69.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
1
Accepted
2012
Motivation: It took forever.
26.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
0
0
Rejected
2013
Motivation: The referee did not read the paper but he/she rejected the paper with una sentence without motivation.