Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
22.6 weeks
22.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2024
Motivation:
The manuscript remained 'with the editor' until January, when we wrote to find out what had happened. The editor then sent it to the reviewers. One of them revised the manuscript in half an hour without giving any reason for the rejection. The journal has no respect for the work of researchers. After 6 months, we expected at least some justifications that could improve our work.
61.7 weeks
61.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
The journal did not provide any valuable comments, it just wrote that it was not suitable. Several editors have changed, they have sent apologies that they have lost / forgotten, and so on. A good journal if you're in no rush.
n/a
n/a
59 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
17.4 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2019
Motivation:
In my opinion, a better better approach would be to reject the paper straight away than spend several months revieweing it (one reviewer was assigned), with the outcome of the review process being one short paragraph. At least, not for a journal that seeks to achieve prominence in the field.
10.7 weeks
24.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
26.1 weeks
29.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
12.9 weeks
21.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
11.7 weeks
26.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013