Reviews for "Technological Forecasting and Social Change"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 61.7
weeks
61.7
weeks
n/a 1 0
(very bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The journal did not provide any valuable comments, it just wrote that it was not suitable. Several editors have changed, they have sent apologies that they have lost / forgotten, and so on. A good journal if you're in no rush.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change n/a n/a 59.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 17.4
weeks
17.4
weeks
n/a 1 0
(very bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: In my opinion, a better better approach would be to reject the paper straight away than spend several months revieweing it (one reviewer was assigned), with the outcome of the review process being one short paragraph. At least, not for a journal that seeks to achieve prominence in the field.
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 10.7
weeks
24.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 26.1
weeks
29.0
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 12.9
weeks
21.6
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
3
(good)
Accepted
Technological Forecasting and Social Change 11.7
weeks
26.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Accepted