Reviews for "TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism 16.0
weeks
16.0
weeks
n/a 0 n/a 0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: My article submission was rejected without any peer review feedback. I requested feedback and received no response.
TC: A Journal of Biblical Textual Criticism 4.6
weeks
4.6
weeks
n/a 1 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The Journal offered a speedy, yet rigorous, review procedure. The review wasn't all too brief: the reviewer went into some length with his most accurate summary of the overall argument of the article as well as the data presented therein. All the suggestions for improvement (all mostly minor) were useful and resulted in welcome improvements. There were also various suggestions for grammatical and stylistic improvement, which were useful as well