Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.6 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
The Editor showed great professionalism and handled the revision extremely well. The chosen reviewer demonstrated a thorough reading of the manuscript and provided several pages of quite reasonable comments which helped improve the final article.
18.6 weeks
18.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2022
Motivation:
Initially, the editor wanted two reviewers. After the first contact after three months of review duration, the Researcher support wrote that they were waiting for one review report, which the reviewer should send in 2 weeks. After one month, I contacted the journal again and received the answer that the review report was 33 days late, and the support forwarded the query to the handling editor. This editor promptly sent the review report and, based on this report, rejected the manuscript.
After the advertisement of a review time and final decision time frame of 3.5 weeks, my expectations were higher than one review report after 18.6 weeks, on which, after two contacts with the support, the decision was made.
After the advertisement of a review time and final decision time frame of 3.5 weeks, my expectations were higher than one review report after 18.6 weeks, on which, after two contacts with the support, the decision was made.
6.0 weeks
7.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation:
The Editor wrote: "I have read through the manuscript, and while it appears to be a careful study, it does not appear to meet the aims and scope of TALANTA. Talanta publishes original articles dealing with significant advances in analytical methodology."
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
Motivation:
non
1.0 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
The review report were essential and valuable. The review procedure was relatively fast.