Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
15.4 weeks
15.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2020
32.9 weeks
33.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
23.7 weeks
23.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
25.6 weeks
37.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
The review reports were candid and constructive. The quality of the manuscript definitely improved from the initial submission. It is worth the wait!
43.3 weeks
43.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
After 10 months of review process they rejected the paper only with one reviewer comments and the reason was this :"conceptual novelty and thematic balance of the research published in the journal as well as the limitation in number of pages permitted yearly by the publisher"
They could reject within only a week by these reasons not 10 months.
They could reject within only a week by these reasons not 10 months.