Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.6 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2014
Motivation: Reviews were ok but could have been sent to reviewers knowing more about the scientific subjects - most critics were about adhering to journal standards, figures etc. First round of review took a bit too long.