Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
0.1 weeks
5.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2022
4.4 weeks
11.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2022
Motivation:
1. Fast review process (4weeks to the first decision)
2. The MS was reviewed by experts
3. Very detailed and, thus, challenging review
4. The reviewers opinion contributed a lot to improvement of our MS
My overall impression for this journal is very good. My manuscript was sent to experts in this field and undergone thorough review.
Since SSM-population health is an OA journal, APC must be paid. If it were not, I would like to submit more often.
2. The MS was reviewed by experts
3. Very detailed and, thus, challenging review
4. The reviewers opinion contributed a lot to improvement of our MS
My overall impression for this journal is very good. My manuscript was sent to experts in this field and undergone thorough review.
Since SSM-population health is an OA journal, APC must be paid. If it were not, I would like to submit more often.
5.0 weeks
9.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2022
3.0 weeks
5.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
Very quick turnaround time. Professional communication. Good review reports.