Reviews for "Springerplus"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Springerplus 14.0
n/a 1 1
Motivation: It took to my opinion unacceptable long till reviewers had been asigned and reviews arrived. Editors managed to receive one review only. The review suffered from major ill-interpretation of our results. I informed the editors about the shortcomings of the review and asked them to inform the reviewer and to reconsider their decision (rejection) based on my explanations by which I rectified our approach. The editors told me that they will take care of my "problem". However, I never got an answer. Our mansucript virtually disappeared. This is certainly a terrible way to deal with the work and ideas of ours. I appreciate the scirev-initiative since I feel often rightless in light of such kind of arbitrainess.