Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
14.0 weeks
14.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
It took to my opinion unacceptable long till reviewers had been asigned and reviews arrived. Editors managed to receive one review only. The review suffered from major ill-interpretation of our results. I informed the editors about the shortcomings of the review and asked them to inform the reviewer and to reconsider their decision (rejection) based on my explanations by which I rectified our approach. The editors told me that they will take care of my "problem". However, I never got an answer. Our mansucript virtually disappeared. This is certainly a terrible way to deal with the work and ideas of ours. I appreciate the scirev-initiative since I feel often rightless in light of such kind of arbitrainess.