Reviews for "Sports Medicine"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a n/a 7.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Motivation: In my view, scientific journals should not make recommendations to other journals when rejecting a paper, especially when the suggestion is related to an alternative and lucrative marketplace of Open Access "sister" journals that charge amounts of money.
n/a n/a 11.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2017
Motivation: While the manuscript was rejected the decision was quick.
4.7
weeks
9.6
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: I would highly recommend publishing within Sports Medicine. The review process significantly enhanced the quality of our manuscript and all reviewer reports and editorial decisions were extremely timely.