Reviews for "Sports Medicine"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Sports Medicine | n/a | n/a | 7.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: In my view, scientific journals should not make recommendations to other journals when rejecting a paper, especially when the suggestion is related to an alternative and lucrative marketplace of Open Access "sister" journals that charge amounts of money. | |||||||
Sports Medicine | n/a | n/a | 11.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: While the manuscript was rejected the decision was quick. | |||||||
Sports Medicine | 4.7 weeks |
9.6 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: I would highly recommend publishing within Sports Medicine. The review process significantly enhanced the quality of our manuscript and all reviewer reports and editorial decisions were extremely timely. |