Reviews for "Speech Communication"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Speech Communication 11.1
weeks
11.1
weeks
n/a 1 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: I wish I wanted an opinion from more than one review. My general impression of this journal is that the editor(s) rely too much on reviewers' comments, not making their own decisions.
Speech Communication 13.0
weeks
22.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: In the first round of reviews, one reviewer recommend "accept". The other reviewer went beyond his/her duty, and raised excellent comments. We sincerely address these concerns, but the paper was sent to new reviewers who rejected the paper rather casually. The main reason, as far as I could see, was that the paper uses a framework that they did not like.
Speech Communication 10.9
weeks
10.9
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: The reviewers point out only minor problems and recommended rejection. The editor added no comments, saying that "since reviewer rejected the paper, I am going to follow that recommendation." The English by both the reviewers and the editor were very non-native.