Reviews for "Solar Energy"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Solar Energy | 4.3 weeks |
5.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
| Solar Energy | 14.3 weeks |
18.6 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: The review period was not quite long, and there were plausible comments for the paper improvement. | |||||||
| Solar Energy | 12.6 weeks |
13.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| Solar Energy | 8.6 weeks |
8.6 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: Reviewers' comments were clear and justified, the peer-review process was quite fast. | |||||||
| Solar Energy | n/a | n/a | 7.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| Solar Energy | 11.0 weeks |
18.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: The reviewers comments were very useful and absolutely well-justified, thus contributing to the improvement of the paper. After paper acceptance, the editing and publication processes were very fast. | |||||||
| Solar Energy | Immediately accepted after 14.0 weeks | Accepted (im.) | |||||