Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.3 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
14.3 weeks
18.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
The review period was not quite long, and there were plausible comments for the paper improvement.
12.6 weeks
13.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2018
8.6 weeks
8.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2012
Motivation:
Reviewers' comments were clear and justified, the peer-review process was quite fast.
n/a
n/a
7 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015
11.0 weeks
18.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
The reviewers comments were very useful and absolutely well-justified, thus contributing to the improvement of the paper. After paper acceptance, the editing and publication processes were very fast.
Immediately accepted after 14.0 weeks
Accepted (im.)
2014