Reviews for "Soft Matter"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
Soft Matter	3.0 weeks	4.9 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
Soft Matter	Motivation: The review process was quick. The editors and reviewers were fair.
Soft Matter	4.4 weeks	7.1 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
Soft Matter	Motivation: The review rounds were (relatively) quick and the editor also responded quickly. Overall we're very pleased with the whole process.
Soft Matter	2.9 weeks	3.0 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
Soft Matter	3.9 weeks	4.6 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
Soft Matter	Motivation: The review process was quick and the comments made by the reviewers helped us improve the manuscript.
Soft Matter	3.0 weeks	6.0 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Rejected
Soft Matter	Motivation: While our manuscript was rejected, both editors and reviewers were reasonably fair and balanced, and suggested an alternative journal for publication. The manuscript was quickly accepted after transferring to another journal. Communication was quick and so was the review process.
Soft Matter	n/a	n/a	4.0 days	n/a	n/a	n/a	Rejected (im.)
Soft Matter	5.0 weeks	10.0 weeks	n/a	2	4 (very good)	3 (good)	Accepted