Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.6 weeks
23.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
My first paper that's mostly theoretical, so hard to gauge the reviews, overall a bit slow, but satisfactory.
12.7 weeks
12.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
12.3 weeks
12.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2019
Motivation:
reviewers argued that pper was not theoretical enough for this journal - this is more of an editorial decision in my opinion. reviews were very short and superficial, no real effort from 2 reviewers to give constructive criticism, editor could have offered a revise to sharpen the theoretcial contribution
n/a
n/a
11 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
The exact wording: "Unfortunately we do not feel that this work is suitable for publication in this journal at the present time. "
Alternate journal was recommended.
Alternate journal was recommended.
13.0 weeks
26.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
Published twice on the journal. First time the editors were very active and up to their job; got the reviews back quickly as well as a reasoned decision. When submitted the second paper the editors had changed. The process was considerably slower and the editors seemed to have hard time in making the final decision.
17.4 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
30.4 weeks
30.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2015
20.0 weeks
25.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
Motivation:
The editorial process was a bit slow but apart from this the process went smoothly. The reviewers comments were very helpful and I would submit to this journal any time again.
6.0 weeks
20.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2012
Motivation:
There was one very positive review of the first vesion and one negative. For the revision the paper was not sent to the original positive one, and sent to another who was strongly antagonistic. The editors made no justification of the decicion not to permit a further revision to meet the demands of the new reviwer of the revised version.