Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
21.7 weeks
51.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
3
Accepted
2011
Motivation: Although the review process was very lengthy, it was meticulous, and I got the impression that the editor was keen to try to help us to produce a finished product which was of really good quality. We felt we had achieved this in the end.